VS
CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF (CEQY) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CEQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while TEQT leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CEQY features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for TEQT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CEQY
TEQT
| AuM | $10.11 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEQY | +2.30% | +2.23% | +16.54% | +17.50% | - |
TEQT | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | CEQY | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$8 M | +$8 M | - |
TEQT | - | - | - | - | - |
CEQY vs TEQT exposure
Countries
CEQY
USA
44.83%
Canada
26.39%
Other
28.79%
TEQT
USA
54.11%
Canada
24.41%
Other
21.47%
Sectors
CEQY
Technology
26.22%
Finance
24.05%
Industrials
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.21%
Energy
7.26%
Other
25.12%
TEQT
Technology
28.27%
Finance
22.94%
Industrials
9.24%
Non-Energy Materials
7.57%
Healthcare
7.11%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.10%
Other
17.76%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CEQY
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
2.45%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.72%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.36%
Shopify, Inc.
1.32%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.07%
TEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
4.24%
Apple, Inc.
3.74%
Microsoft Corp.
3.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.06%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.64%
Broadcom Inc.
1.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.33%
Shopify, Inc.
1.15%
Diversification
CEQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,262 total
19.28%
TEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,716 total
21.97%
Characteristics
Compare
CEQY
TEQT
| Provider | CIBC | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.07% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 25, 2025 | April 15, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about CEQY and TEQT
How do the fees of CEQY and TEQT compare?
CEQY has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while TEQT has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of CEQY and TEQT?
CEQY's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. TEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CEQY or TEQT?
CEQY holds 6145 securities, while TEQT holds 1695. On holdings count, CEQY is the more diversified portfolio.
How are CEQY and TEQT managed?
CEQY is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. TEQT is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CEQY and TEQT emphasize?
CEQY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. TEQT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.