VS
CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF (CEQY) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CEQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while TGRO leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CEQY features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.28% for TGRO. Performance-wise, CEQY has returned 16.54% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas TGRO is at 13.27% with +$149 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CEQY
TGRO
| AuM | $10.11 M | $462.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEQY | +2.30% | +2.23% | +16.54% | +17.50% | - |
TGRO | +1.68% | +1.81% | +13.27% | +14.87% | +76.53% | |
| Flows | CEQY | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$8 M | +$8 M | - |
TGRO | +$6 M | +$28 M | +$149 M | +$182 M | +$338 M |
CEQY vs TGRO exposure
Countries
CEQY
USA
44.83%
Canada
26.39%
Other
28.79%
TGRO
USA
39.47%
Canada
24.29%
Other
15.39%
Other
20.85%
Sectors
CEQY
Technology
26.22%
Finance
24.05%
Industrials
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.21%
Energy
7.26%
Other
25.12%
TGRO
Technology
21.47%
Finance
20.89%
Other
15.39%
Industrials
8.08%
Non-Energy Materials
7.20%
Other
26.96%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CEQY
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
2.45%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.72%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.36%
Shopify, Inc.
1.32%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.07%
TGRO
NVIDIA Corp.
3.08%
Apple, Inc.
2.72%
Microsoft Corp.
2.23%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.50%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.19%
Shopify, Inc.
1.15%
Broadcom Inc.
1.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.03%
Diversification
CEQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,262 total
19.28%
TGRO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,716 total
17.13%
Characteristics
Compare
CEQY
TGRO
| Provider | CIBC | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.07% | 1.52% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 25, 2025 | August 18, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CEQY and TGRO
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CEQY or TGRO?
As of October 15, 2026, CEQY has returned 16.54% year to date, while TGRO has returned 13.27%. CEQY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CEQY or TGRO?
As of October 15, 2026, CEQY manages $10.11 M in assets, while TGRO manages $462.85 M. TGRO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CEQY and TGRO managed?
CEQY is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. TGRO is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CEQY and TGRO emphasize?
CEQY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. TGRO is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CEQY or TGRO?
Year to date, CEQY has seen +$8.19 M in net flows, compared with +$148.55 M for TGRO. TGRO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CEQY and TGRO compare?
CEQY has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while TGRO has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of CEQY and TGRO?
CEQY's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. TGRO's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CEQY or TGRO?
CEQY holds 6145 securities, while TGRO holds 1695. On holdings count, CEQY is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.