CESG
CI MSCI World ESG Impact Index ETF

Full CESG fund page
VS
GDIV
Manulife Smart Global Dividend ETF Portfolio

Full GDIV fund page

Compare CI MSCI World ESG Impact Index ETF (CESG) vs Manulife Smart Global Dividend ETF Portfolio (GDIV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CESG provides Healthcare, Technology, and Finance exposures, while GDIV is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CESG features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for GDIV. Performance-wise, CESG has returned 20.49% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas GDIV is at 19.21% with +$75 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CESG
-1.53%+3.05%+20.49%+18.01%+28.61%
GDIV
-1.18%+0.10%+19.21%+18.62%+77.27%
Flows
CESG
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M-$2 M
GDIV
+$6 M+$23 M+$75 M+$78 M+$73 M

CESG vs GDIV exposure

Countries

CESG
USA
64.65%
Japan
7.94%
Other
27.41%
GDIV
USA
64.74%
Canada
7.41%
Other
27.85%

Sectors

CESG
Healthcare
26.43%
Technology
21.94%
Finance
15.82%
Industrials
12.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.30%
Other
12.68%
GDIV
Technology
31.45%
Finance
28.36%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
31.94%
As of October 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CESG
ServiceNow, Inc.
6.65%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
5.74%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
5.50%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.20%
Novartis AG
4.64%
Equinix, Inc.
4.59%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.58%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
4.37%
First Solar, Inc.
4.17%
CSL Ltd.
3.06%
GDIV
NVIDIA Corp.
5.28%
Microsoft Corp.
3.84%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.30%
United Parcel Service, Inc.
1.91%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.90%
Lam Research Corp.
1.80%
Apple, Inc.
1.76%
Broadcom Inc.
1.69%
Paychex, Inc.
1.46%
HP, Inc.
1.44%

Diversification

CESG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 67 total
48.51%
GDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 436 total
23.37%

Characteristics

Compare
CESG
GDIV
ProviderCIManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.24%1.49%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateSeptember 12, 2019May 15, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CESG and GDIV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CESG or GDIV?
As of October 20, 2026, CESG has returned 20.49% year to date, while GDIV has returned 19.21%. CESG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CESG or GDIV?
As of October 20, 2026, CESG manages $10.51 M in assets, while GDIV manages $94.30 M. GDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CESG and GDIV managed?
CESG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the MSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CAD benchmark. GDIV is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CESG and GDIV emphasize?
CESG is most exposed to Healthcare, Technology, and Finance. GDIV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CESG or GDIV?
Year to date, CESG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$75.03 M for GDIV. GDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CESG and GDIV compare?
CESG has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while GDIV has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of CESG and GDIV?
CESG's largest holdings include ServiceNow, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Marvell Technology, Inc.. GDIV's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Cisco Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CESG or GDIV?
CESG holds 67 securities, while GDIV holds 435. On holdings count, GDIV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CESG and GDIV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds