VS
CI MSCI World ESG Impact Index ETF (CESG) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CESG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare, Technology, and Finance, while XMS leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CESG features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.3% for XMS. Performance-wise, CESG has returned 21.24% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas XMS is at 7.56% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CESG
XMS
| AuM | $10.58 M | $65.39 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.33% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.16% | 0.55% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CESG | -0.92% | +2.80% | +21.24% | +18.63% | +29.36% |
XMS | +2.93% | +5.53% | +7.56% | +7.04% | +40.97% | |
| Flows | CESG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M |
XMS | -$6 M | -$2 M | +$4 M | +$6 M | +$13 M |
CESG vs XMS exposure
Countries
CESG
USA
64.65%
Japan
7.94%
Other
27.41%
XMS
USA
93.04%
Sectors
CESG
Healthcare
26.43%
Technology
21.94%
Finance
15.82%
Industrials
12.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.30%
Other
12.68%
XMS
Technology
30.24%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
14.02%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.66%
Other
30.21%
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CESG
ServiceNow, Inc.
6.65%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
5.74%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
5.50%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.20%
Novartis AG
4.64%
Equinix, Inc.
4.59%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.58%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
4.37%
First Solar, Inc.
4.17%
CSL Ltd.
3.06%
XMS
Microsoft Corp.
1.56%
Amphenol Corp.
1.51%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.51%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.50%
Welltower, Inc.
1.49%
Johnson & Johnson
1.45%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.45%
Chubb Ltd.
1.45%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.45%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.43%
Diversification
CESG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 67 total
48.51%
XMS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 173 total
14.81%
Characteristics
Compare
CESG
XMS
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CAD | MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.23% | 1.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | September 12, 2019 | April 5, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about CESG and XMS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CESG or XMS?
As of October 21, 2026, CESG has returned 21.24% year to date, while XMS has returned 7.56%. CESG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CESG or XMS?
As of October 21, 2026, CESG manages $10.58 M in assets, while XMS manages $65.39 M. XMS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CESG and XMS managed?
CESG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the MSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CAD benchmark. XMS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CESG and XMS emphasize?
CESG is most exposed to Healthcare, Technology, and Finance. XMS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CESG or XMS?
Year to date, CESG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$4.16 M for XMS. XMS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CESG and XMS compare?
CESG has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XMS has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of CESG and XMS?
CESG's largest holdings include ServiceNow, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Marvell Technology, Inc.. XMS's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Amphenol Corp., and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CESG or XMS?
CESG holds 67 securities, while XMS holds 173. On holdings count, XMS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.