CFRN
CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF

Full CFRN fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, CFRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CFRN has returned 1.46% year-to-date with +$64 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 35.86% with -$461 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CFRN
+0.21%+0.71%+1.46%+3.03%+12.98%
HBNK
+6.04%+19.91%+35.86%+71.53%+159.08%
Flows
CFRN
+$13 M+$52 M+$64 M+$108 M+$289 M
HBNK
-$44 M+$39 M-$461 M-$767 M+$3 M

CFRN vs HBNK exposure

Countries

CFRN
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CFRN
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CFRN
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

CFRN
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CFRN
HBNK
ProviderCIBCGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.17%2.48%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 22, 2019July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CFRN and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CFRN or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, CFRN has returned 1.46% year to date, while HBNK has returned 35.86%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CFRN or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, CFRN manages $616.48 M in assets, while HBNK manages $807.27 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CFRN and HBNK managed?
CFRN is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CFRN or HBNK?
Year to date, CFRN has seen +$63.92 M in net flows, compared with -$461.23 M for HBNK. CFRN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CFRN and HBNK compare?
CFRN has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about CFRN and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds