VS
CI Global High Yield Credit Private Pool ETF (CGHY) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CGHY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Banks, Pipelines, and Power, while HBNK leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CGHY features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CGHY has returned 2.89% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.72% with -$462 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGHY
HBNK
| AuM | $35.61 M | $787.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.44% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGHY | -0.13% | +0.63% | +2.89% | +5.70% | +26.22% |
HBNK | +1.99% | +16.52% | +32.72% | +67.44% | +149.42% | |
| Flows | CGHY | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$23 M | +$24 M | +$23 M |
HBNK | -$33 M | +$8 M | -$462 M | -$768 M | -$7 M |
CGHY vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CGHY
Other
54.24%
USA
21.67%
Canada
18.88%
HBNK
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CGHY
Other
54.24%
Other
45.76%
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGHY
US28002AAA43
2.00%
US21874LAA08
1.95%
US00202DAA54
1.76%
US58990CAA18
1.71%
US29273VBH24
1.56%
AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD
1.49%
CA775109DJ70
1.42%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27)
1.19%
Fairfax India Holdings, 5% 26feb2028, USD
1.14%
RHP Hotel Properties, 6.5% 1apr2032, USD
1.05%
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
CGHY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
15.28%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CGHY
HBNK
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.04% | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 8, 2022 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CGHY and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGHY or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY has returned 2.89% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.72%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGHY or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY manages $35.61 M in assets, while HBNK manages $787.51 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGHY and HBNK managed?
CGHY is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CGHY and HBNK emphasize?
CGHY is most exposed to Banks, Pipelines, and Power. HBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGHY or HBNK?
Year to date, CGHY has seen +$22.63 M in net flows, compared with -$462.37 M for HBNK. CGHY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGHY and HBNK compare?
CGHY has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of CGHY and HBNK?
CGHY's largest holdings include AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD and Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27). HBNK's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGHY or HBNK?
CGHY holds 116 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, CGHY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGHY and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.