VS
CI Global High Yield Credit Private Pool ETF (CGHY) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CGHY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Banks, Pipelines, and Power, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CGHY features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CGHY has returned 2.89% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.65% with +$209 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGHY
ZEB
| AuM | $35.61 M | $7,263.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGHY | -0.13% | +0.63% | +2.89% | +5.70% | +26.22% |
ZEB | +1.98% | +16.51% | +32.65% | +67.24% | +148.29% | |
| Flows | CGHY | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$23 M | +$24 M | +$23 M |
ZEB | +$972 M | +$1,234 M | +$209 M | +$894 M | -$431 M |
CGHY vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CGHY
Other
54.24%
USA
21.67%
Canada
18.88%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CGHY
Other
54.24%
Other
45.76%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGHY
US28002AAA43
2.00%
US21874LAA08
1.95%
US00202DAA54
1.76%
US58990CAA18
1.71%
US29273VBH24
1.56%
AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD
1.49%
CA775109DJ70
1.42%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27)
1.19%
Fairfax India Holdings, 5% 26feb2028, USD
1.14%
RHP Hotel Properties, 6.5% 1apr2032, USD
1.05%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
CGHY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
15.28%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CGHY
ZEB
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.04% | 2.29% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 8, 2022 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CGHY and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGHY or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY has returned 2.89% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.65%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGHY or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY manages $35.61 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.26 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGHY and ZEB managed?
CGHY is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CGHY and ZEB emphasize?
CGHY is most exposed to Banks, Pipelines, and Power. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGHY or ZEB?
Year to date, CGHY has seen +$22.63 M in net flows, compared with +$209.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGHY and ZEB compare?
CGHY has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CGHY and ZEB?
CGHY's largest holdings include AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD and Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27). ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGHY or ZEB?
CGHY holds 116 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CGHY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGHY and ZEB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.