VS
CI Global High Yield Credit Private Pool ETF (CGHY) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CGHY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Banks, Pipelines, and Power, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CGHY features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, CGHY has returned 2.89% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.25% with -$127 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGHY
ZUT
| AuM | $35.61 M | $853.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGHY | -0.13% | +0.63% | +2.89% | +5.70% | +26.22% |
ZUT | +1.08% | +6.43% | +22.25% | +25.92% | +52.94% | |
| Flows | CGHY | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$23 M | +$24 M | +$23 M |
ZUT | -$5 M | -$67 M | -$127 M | -$50 M | +$186 M |
CGHY vs ZUT exposure
Countries
CGHY
Other
54.24%
USA
21.67%
Canada
18.88%
ZUT
Canada
83.77%
Bermuda
16.23%
Sectors
CGHY
Other
54.24%
Other
45.76%
ZUT
Utilities
84.34%
Energy
8.20%
Industrials
7.46%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGHY
US28002AAA43
2.00%
US21874LAA08
1.95%
US00202DAA54
1.76%
US58990CAA18
1.71%
US29273VBH24
1.56%
AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD
1.49%
CA775109DJ70
1.42%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27)
1.19%
Fairfax India Holdings, 5% 26feb2028, USD
1.14%
RHP Hotel Properties, 6.5% 1apr2032, USD
1.05%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.57%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.77%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.20%
Capital Power Corp.
8.05%
TransAlta Corp.
7.83%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.73%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.46%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.33%
ATCO Ltd.
7.25%
Emera, Inc.
7.16%
Diversification
CGHY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 200 total
15.28%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.35%
Characteristics
Compare
CGHY
ZUT
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.04% | 2.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 8, 2022 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about CGHY and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGHY or ZUT?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY has returned 2.89% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.25%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGHY or ZUT?
As of July 20, 2026, CGHY manages $35.61 M in assets, while ZUT manages $853.07 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGHY and ZUT managed?
CGHY is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CGHY and ZUT emphasize?
CGHY is most exposed to Banks, Pipelines, and Power. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGHY or ZUT?
Year to date, CGHY has seen +$22.63 M in net flows, compared with -$127.21 M for ZUT. CGHY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGHY and ZUT compare?
CGHY has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of CGHY and ZUT?
CGHY's largest holdings include AltaGas, 7.2% 15oct2054, USD and Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.75% perp., CAD (27). ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., Brookfield Renewable Partners LP, and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGHY or ZUT?
CGHY holds 116 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, CGHY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGHY and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.