CGL.C
iShares Gold Bullion ETF

Full CGL.C fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, CGL.C features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, CGL.C has returned 10.26% year-to-date with +$42 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 2.36% with +$257 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Mar 13Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 13, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CGL.C
-5.89%+1.51%+10.26%+45.91%+133.77%
ZSP
+4.75%-0.02%+2.36%+29.16%+79.17%
Flows
CGL.C
+$0 M+$42 M+$42 M+$53 M+$202 M
ZSP
+$49 M-$179 M+$257 M+$1,518 M+$4,437 M

CGL.C vs ZSP exposure

Countries

CGL.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.94%

Sectors

CGL.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
34.08%
Financials
10.54%
Communication Services
10.30%
Consumer Discretionary
9.98%
Health Care
9.46%
Industrials
8.53%
Other
17.11%
As of April 13, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CGL.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.62%
APPLE
6.84%
MICROSOFT-T
5.07%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.44%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.04%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.58%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.42%
META PLATFORMS
2.42%
TESLA
1.94%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.57%

Diversification

CGL.C
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.93%

Characteristics

Compare
CGL.C
ZSP
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkLBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index - USDS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCommodityEquity
Dividend PolicyNo incomeDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.82%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 31, 2011November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about CGL.C and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGL.C or ZSP?
As of April 13, 2026, CGL.C has returned 10.26% year to date, while ZSP has returned 2.36%. CGL.C is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGL.C or ZSP?
As of April 13, 2026, CGL.C manages $858.39 M in assets, while ZSP manages $21.78 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGL.C and ZSP managed?
CGL.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the LBMA London Gold Market Fixing Price PM Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGL.C or ZSP?
Year to date, CGL.C has seen +$42.49 M in net flows, compared with +$257.03 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGL.C and ZSP compare?
CGL.C has an expense ratio of 0.55%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about CGL.C and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds