VS
When evaluating costs, CGMU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CGMU has returned 44.4% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 25.35% with -$415 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGMU
HBNK
| AuM | $17.00 M | $791.30 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGMU | -46.68% | -56.73% | -44.40% | +112.60% | - |
HBNK | +8.46% | +23.65% | +25.35% | +68.05% | - | |
| Flows | CGMU | +$6 M | +$6 M | +$5 M | -$16 M | - |
HBNK | +$31 M | -$184 M | -$415 M | -$667 M | - |
CGMU vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
CGMU
HBNK
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 28, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CGMU and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGMU or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, CGMU has returned -44.40% year to date, while HBNK has returned 25.35%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGMU or HBNK?
As of June 12, 2026, CGMU manages $17.00 M in assets, while HBNK manages $791.30 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGMU and HBNK managed?
CGMU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGMU or HBNK?
Year to date, CGMU has seen +$4.92 M in net flows, compared with -$414.83 M for HBNK. CGMU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGMU and HBNK compare?
CGMU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about CGMU and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.