VS
When evaluating costs, CGMU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, CGMU has returned 44.4% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 11.19% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGMU
XIC
| AuM | $17.00 M | $30,257.63 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGMU | -46.68% | -56.73% | -44.40% | +112.60% | - |
XIC | +2.09% | +6.97% | +11.19% | +34.35% | +90.68% | |
| Flows | CGMU | +$6 M | +$6 M | +$5 M | -$16 M | - |
XIC | +$420 M | +$2,784 M | +$5,677 M | +$7,745 M | +$11,716 M |
CGMU vs XIC exposure
Countries
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%
Diversification
CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%
Characteristics
Compare
CGMU
XIC
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 28, 2025 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CGMU and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGMU or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, CGMU has returned -44.40% year to date, while XIC has returned 11.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGMU or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, CGMU manages $17.00 M in assets, while XIC manages $30.26 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGMU and XIC managed?
CGMU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGMU or XIC?
Year to date, CGMU has seen +$4.92 M in net flows, compared with +$5,676.75 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGMU and XIC compare?
CGMU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about CGMU and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.