CGMU
MegaLong (3X) Canadian Gold Miners Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF

Full CGMU fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, CGMU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CGMU has returned 33.25% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 28.06% with -$535 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-40-30-20-10010%May 18May 25Jun 1Jun 8Jun 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CGMU
-11.42%-39.44%-33.25%+149.60%-
ZEB
+10.10%+24.68%+28.06%+71.51%+148.45%
Flows
CGMU
+$7 M+$7 M+$6 M-$15 M-
ZEB
+$679 M+$394 M-$535 M-$374 M-$1,242 M

CGMU vs ZEB exposure

Countries

CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

CGMU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CGMU
ZEB
ProviderLongPoint Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.36%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 28, 2025October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about CGMU and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGMU or ZEB?
As of June 17, 2026, CGMU has returned -33.25% year to date, while ZEB has returned 28.06%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGMU or ZEB?
As of June 17, 2026, CGMU manages $21.41 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.31 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGMU and ZEB managed?
CGMU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGMU or ZEB?
Year to date, CGMU has seen +$5.94 M in net flows, compared with -$534.91 M for ZEB. CGMU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGMU and ZEB compare?
CGMU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Recent articles about CGMU and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds