CGR
iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF

Full CGR fund page
VS
QRET
Mackenzie Developed Markets Real Estate Index ETF

Full QRET fund page

Compare iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR) vs Mackenzie Developed Markets Real Estate Index ETF (QRET) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGR provides Finance exposures, while QRET is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, CGR features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.4% for QRET. Performance-wise, CGR has returned 5.51% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas QRET is at 5.67% with -$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CGR
-4.48%-5.74%+5.51%+3.82%+30.22%
QRET
-4.08%-4.51%+5.67%+4.46%+32.38%
Flows
CGR
+$5 M+$13 M+$32 M+$25 M+$56 M
QRET
+$0 M-$19 M-$12 M-$12 M-$7 M

CGR vs QRET exposure

Countries

CGR
USA
66.44%
Japan
9.28%
Other
24.29%
QRET
USA
69.17%
Japan
8.24%
Other
22.59%

Sectors

CGR
Finance
99.69%
QRET
Finance
99.01%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CGR
Simon Property Group, Inc.
4.50%
Welltower, Inc.
4.29%
Public Storage
4.14%
Prologis, Inc.
4.09%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
4.01%
Realty Income Corp.
3.99%
Equinix, Inc.
3.82%
American Tower Corp.
3.80%
Ventas, Inc.
3.39%
Goodman Group
3.26%
QRET
Welltower, Inc.
6.81%
Prologis, Inc.
5.61%
Equinix, Inc.
4.21%
American Tower Corp.
3.36%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
3.06%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
2.75%
Realty Income Corp.
2.49%
Public Storage
2.19%
CBRE Group, Inc.
1.82%
Ventas, Inc.
1.80%

Diversification

CGR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
39.28%
QRET
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 317 total
34.10%

Characteristics

Compare
CGR
QRET
ProvideriSharesMackenzie Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCohen & Steers Global Realty Majors Total Return Index - USDSolactive GBS Developed Markets Real Estate Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.37%2.85%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 26, 2008September 24, 2020

Frequently asked questions about CGR and QRET

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGR or QRET?
As of September 16, 2026, CGR has returned 5.51% year to date, while QRET has returned 5.67%. QRET is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGR or QRET?
As of September 16, 2026, CGR manages $280.22 M in assets, while QRET manages $5.96 M. CGR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGR and QRET managed?
CGR is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Cohen & Steers Global Realty Majors Total Return Index - USD benchmark. QRET is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Real Estate Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CGR and QRET emphasize?
CGR is most exposed to Finance. QRET is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGR or QRET?
Year to date, CGR has seen +$32.18 M in net flows, compared with -$12.46 M for QRET. CGR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGR and QRET compare?
CGR has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while QRET has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of CGR and QRET?
CGR's largest holdings include Simon Property Group, Inc., Welltower, Inc., and Public Storage. QRET's top holdings include Welltower, Inc., Prologis, Inc., and Equinix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGR or QRET?
CGR holds 75 securities, while QRET holds 317. On holdings count, QRET is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CGR and QRET

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds