When evaluating costs, CGRW features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, CGRW has returned 10.23% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.75% with +$285 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRW
ZSP
| AuM | $3.51 M | $23,773.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRW | -0.27% | +5.23% | +10.23% | - | - |
ZSP | -0.20% | +7.33% | +11.75% | +21.86% | +80.75% | |
| Flows | CGRW | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | - | - |
ZSP | -$338 M | +$44 M | +$285 M | +$842 M | +$4,796 M |
CGRW vs ZSP exposure
Countries
CGRW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.86%
Sectors
CGRW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
46.52%
Finance
12.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.38%
Healthcare
8.23%
Industrials
7.68%
Other
15.54%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.51%
Broadcom Inc.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Tesla, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Diversification
CGRW
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
39.24%
Characteristics
Compare
CGRW
ZSP
| Provider | CIBC | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 6, 2025 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about CGRW and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRW or ZSP?
As of July 16, 2026, CGRW has returned 10.23% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.75%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRW or ZSP?
As of July 16, 2026, CGRW manages $3.51 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.77 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRW and ZSP managed?
CGRW is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRW or ZSP?
Year to date, CGRW has seen +$2.12 M in net flows, compared with +$284.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRW and ZSP compare?
CGRW has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about CGRW and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.