VS
Compare CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF (CGXF) vs CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF (CGXF.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGXF and CGXF.U provide the same top sector exposures: Materials. When evaluating costs, CGXF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CGXF.U. Performance-wise, CGXF has returned 7.51% year-to-date with +$76 M in net flows, whereas CGXF.U is at 7.63% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGXF
CGXF.U
| AuM | $232.37 M | $8.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGXF | -15.71% | -18.87% | -7.51% | +36.54% | +115.50% |
CGXF.U | -16.29% | -19.45% | -7.63% | +36.98% | +118.88% | |
| Flows | CGXF | +$19 M | +$76 M | +$76 M | +$42 M | +$15 M |
CGXF.U | +$0 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$5 M |
CGXF vs CGXF.U exposure
Countries
CGXF
Canada
52.92%
USA
33.34%
United Kingdom
13.75%
CGXF.U
Canada
52.92%
USA
33.34%
United Kingdom
13.75%
Sectors
CGXF
Materials
79.66%
Other
20.34%
CGXF.U
Materials
79.66%
Other
20.34%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGXF
NEWMONT CORP
7.16%
KINROSS GOLD
7.15%
GB00BRXH2664
6.98%
PAN AMERICAN
6.94%
ENDEAVOUR MINING
6.77%
US38059T1060
6.76%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
6.73%
HECLA MINING
6.61%
CA06849F1080
6.61%
ROYAL GOLD
6.59%
CGXF.U
NEWMONT CORP
7.16%
KINROSS GOLD
7.15%
GB00BRXH2664
6.98%
PAN AMERICAN
6.94%
ENDEAVOUR MINING
6.77%
US38059T1060
6.76%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
6.73%
HECLA MINING
6.61%
CA06849F1080
6.61%
ROYAL GOLD
6.59%
Diversification
CGXF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
68.30%
CGXF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
68.30%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGXF and CGXF.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGXF or CGXF.U?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF has returned -7.51% year to date, while CGXF.U has returned -7.63%. CGXF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGXF or CGXF.U?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF manages $232.37 M in assets, while CGXF.U manages $8.52 M. CGXF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGXF and CGXF.U managed?
CGXF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CGXF.U is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGXF and CGXF.U emphasize?
CGXF is most exposed to Materials. CGXF.U is most exposed to Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGXF or CGXF.U?
Year to date, CGXF has seen +$75.87 M in net flows, compared with +$3.10 M for CGXF.U. CGXF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGXF and CGXF.U compare?
CGXF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while CGXF.U has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of CGXF and CGXF.U?
CGXF's largest holdings include NEWMONT CORP and KINROSS GOLD. CGXF.U's top holdings include NEWMONT CORP and KINROSS GOLD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGXF or CGXF.U?
CGXF holds 13 securities, while CGXF.U holds 13. On holdings count, CGXF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGXF and CGXF.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.