ETF Market Canada › ETF Comparison › CGXF vs ZWC

CGXF vs ZWC ETF Comparison

ENFR
With ETF data and analysis by
Cboe
Back to Cboe homepageFR
CGXF
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF
Full CGXF fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF
Full ZWC fund page

Compare CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF (CGXF) vs BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGXF provides Materials exposures, while ZWC is primarily weighted in Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, CGXF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, CGXF has returned 7.51% year-to-date with +$76 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 12.7% with +$212 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20.0-15.0-10.0-5.00.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CGXF
-15.71%-18.87%-7.51%+36.54%+115.50%
ZWC
+2.22%+6.78%+12.70%+29.29%+64.10%
Flows
CGXF
+$19 M+$76 M+$76 M+$42 M+$15 M
ZWC
+$42 M+$136 M+$212 M+$284 M+$224 M

CGXF vs ZWC exposure

Countries

CGXF
Canada
52.92%
USA
33.34%
United Kingdom
13.75%
ZWC
Canada
98.39%

Sectors

CGXF
Materials
79.66%
Other
20.34%
ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CGXF
NEWMONT CORP
7.16%
KINROSS GOLD
7.15%
GB00BRXH2664
6.98%
PAN AMERICAN
6.94%
ENDEAVOUR MINING
6.77%
US38059T1060
6.76%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
6.73%
HECLA MINING
6.61%
CA06849F1080
6.61%
ROYAL GOLD
6.59%
ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%

Diversification

CGXF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
68.30%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%

Characteristics

Compare
CGXF
ZWC
ProviderCIBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield13.32%5.56%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 1, 2011February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about CGXF and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGXF or ZWC?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF has returned -7.51% year to date, while ZWC has returned 12.70%. ZWC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGXF or ZWC?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF manages $232.37 M in assets, while ZWC manages $2.35 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGXF and ZWC managed?
CGXF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGXF and ZWC emphasize?
CGXF is most exposed to Materials. ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGXF or ZWC?
Year to date, CGXF has seen +$75.87 M in net flows, compared with +$212.10 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGXF and ZWC compare?
CGXF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CGXF and ZWC?
CGXF's largest holdings include NEWMONT CORP and KINROSS GOLD. ZWC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGXF or ZWC?
CGXF holds 13 securities, while ZWC holds 34. On holdings count, ZWC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CGXF and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds