CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page
VS
AIGO
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index

Full AIGO fund page

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index (AIGO) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while AIGO leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.49% for AIGO. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 33.96% year-to-date with +$47 M in net flows, whereas AIGO is at 8.04% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10-50510152025%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CHPS
+23.90%+22.49%+33.96%+126.05%+228.83%
AIGO
+14.91%+4.87%+8.04%+50.51%-
Flows
CHPS
+$20 M+$33 M+$47 M+$67 M+$96 M
AIGO
+$1 M-$2 M+$1 M+$14 M-

CHPS vs AIGO exposure

Countries

CHPS
USA
99.85%
AIGO
USA
74.43%
Republic of Korea
7.91%
Other
17.66%

Sectors

CHPS
Information Technology
63.13%
Other
36.87%
AIGO
Information Technology
63.48%
Communication Services
12.77%
Other
11.34%
Other
12.40%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CHPS
NVIDIA
20.57%
US8740391003
16.02%
BROADCOM LIMITED
15.18%
USN070592100
11.36%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
7.25%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.93%
US5128073062
5.83%
KLA CORPORATION
4.21%
US0420682058
3.51%
QUALCOMM
3.00%
AIGO
SAMSUNG ELECTR
3.96%
SK HYNIX
3.95%
NETFLIX
3.93%
CISCO-T
3.66%
APPLE
3.50%
US8740391003
3.41%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.18%
NVIDIA
3.15%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.02%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
2.92%

Diversification

CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
92.86%
AIGO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 81 total
34.69%

Characteristics

Compare
CHPS
AIGO
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkPHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USDIndxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.01%0.08%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 22, 2021May 14, 2024

Frequently asked questions about CHPS and AIGO

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or AIGO?
As of April 24, 2026, CHPS has returned 33.96% year to date, while AIGO has returned 8.04%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or AIGO?
As of April 24, 2026, CHPS manages $261.34 M in assets, while AIGO manages $21.27 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and AIGO managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. AIGO is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and AIGO emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. AIGO is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or AIGO?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$47.03 M in net flows, compared with +$0.77 M for AIGO. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and AIGO compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while AIGO has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and AIGO?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. AIGO's top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR and SK HYNIX.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or AIGO?
CHPS holds 15 securities, while AIGO holds 72. On holdings count, AIGO is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CHPS and AIGO

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds