VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and Harvest NVIDIA High Income Shares ETF (NVDH) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while NVDH leans towards Information Technology. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.4% for NVDH. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 60.85% year-to-date with +$108 M in net flows, whereas NVDH is at 12.71% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
NVDH
| AuM | $380.79 M | $36.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | +14.11% | +53.52% | +60.85% | +118.08% | +225.77% |
NVDH | -3.55% | +12.71% | +12.71% | +44.32% | - | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$44 M | +$81 M | +$108 M | +$129 M | +$157 M |
NVDH | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | - |
CHPS vs NVDH exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
NVDH
USA
101.00%
Sectors
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
NVDH
Information Technology
101.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
NVDH
NVIDIA
101.00%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
NVDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
NVDH
| Provider | Global X | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 17.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | August 21, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and NVDH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or NVDH?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS has returned 60.85% year to date, while NVDH has returned 12.71%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or NVDH?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS manages $380.79 M in assets, while NVDH manages $36.07 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and NVDH managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. NVDH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CHPS and NVDH emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. NVDH is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or NVDH?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$108.35 M in net flows, compared with +$5.66 M for NVDH. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and NVDH compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while NVDH has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and NVDH?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. NVDH's top holdings include NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or NVDH?
CHPS holds 7 securities, while NVDH holds 1. On holdings count, CHPS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and NVDH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.