VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while XIT leans towards Information Technology, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.55% for XIT. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 28.51% year-to-date with +$49 M in net flows, whereas XIT is at 9.36% with +$80 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
XIT
| AuM | $252.49 M | $736.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | +27.76% | +15.94% | +28.51% | +115.20% | +216.90% |
XIT | +16.46% | -0.63% | -9.36% | +10.32% | +72.90% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$19 M | +$35 M | +$49 M | +$68 M | +$97 M |
XIT | -$7 M | +$12 M | +$80 M | +$33 M | -$89 M |
CHPS vs XIT exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
99.85%
XIT
Canada
99.91%
Sectors
CHPS
Information Technology
63.13%
Other
36.87%
XIT
Information Technology
73.83%
Other
25.73%
As of April 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA
20.57%
US8740391003
16.02%
BROADCOM LIMITED
15.18%
USN070592100
11.36%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
7.25%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.93%
US5128073062
5.83%
KLA CORPORATION
4.21%
US0420682058
3.51%
QUALCOMM
3.00%
XIT
CA15101Q2071
25.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
23.90%
CONSTELLTION STW
23.04%
CGI INC
11.02%
DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP
4.87%
OPEN TEXT
4.42%
KINAXIS
2.21%
BLACKBERRY LTD
1.39%
LIGHTSPEED COMMERCE INC
0.89%
BITFARMS
0.80%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
92.86%
XIT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
98.18%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
XIT
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | March 19, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and XIT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or XIT?
As of April 27, 2026, CHPS has returned 28.51% year to date, while XIT has returned -9.36%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or XIT?
As of April 27, 2026, CHPS manages $252.49 M in assets, while XIT manages $736.09 M. XIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and XIT managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. XIT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and XIT emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. XIT is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or XIT?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$48.82 M in net flows, compared with +$80.22 M for XIT. XIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and XIT compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XIT has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and XIT?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. XIT's top holdings include SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING and CONSTELLTION STW.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or XIT?
CHPS holds 15 securities, while XIT holds 19. On holdings count, XIT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and XIT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.