VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZQQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while ZQQ leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.35% for ZQQ. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 57.94% year-to-date with +$108 M in net flows, whereas ZQQ is at 15.39% with -$36 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
ZQQ
| AuM | $373.90 M | $3,176.45 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.71% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | +9.86% | +46.61% | +57.94% | +114.45% | +219.87% |
ZQQ | +0.41% | +17.06% | +15.39% | +32.22% | +91.51% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$46 M | +$81 M | +$108 M | +$129 M | +$157 M |
ZQQ | +$1 M | +$50 M | -$36 M | +$164 M | +$165 M |
CHPS vs ZQQ exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
ZQQ
USA
96.42%
Sectors
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
ZQQ
Information Technology
51.93%
Communication Services
14.82%
Consumer Discretionary
12.20%
Consumer Staples
7.59%
Other
13.46%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
ZQQ
NVIDIA
9.05%
APPLE
7.06%
MICROSOFT-T
5.61%
AMAZON.COM INC
5.03%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.63%
META PLATFORMS
3.50%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.42%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.36%
TESLA
3.31%
WALMART INC
3.07%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
ZQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
47.03%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
ZQQ
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZQQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZQQ?
As of June 11, 2026, CHPS has returned 57.94% year to date, while ZQQ has returned 15.39%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZQQ?
As of June 11, 2026, CHPS manages $373.90 M in assets, while ZQQ manages $3.18 B. ZQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZQQ managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZQQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and ZQQ emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. ZQQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZQQ?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$108.35 M in net flows, compared with -$36.03 M for ZQQ. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZQQ compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and ZQQ?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. ZQQ's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZQQ?
CHPS holds 7 securities, while ZQQ holds 93. On holdings count, ZQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and ZQQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.