CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 48.11% year-to-date with +$135 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 13.92% with -$96 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CHPS
-4.33%-9.10%+48.11%+78.16%+199.08%
ZUT
-6.00%-4.94%+13.92%+20.18%+49.46%
Flows
CHPS
-$7 M+$40 M+$135 M+$152 M+$186 M
ZUT
+$23 M-$27 M-$96 M-$89 M+$217 M

CHPS vs ZUT exposure

Countries

CHPS
USA
69.15%
Taiwan
17.85%
Netherlands
9.25%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%

Sectors

CHPS
Technology
99.95%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
20.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.85%
Broadcom Inc.
14.21%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
11.20%
ASML Holding NV
9.25%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.82%
Lam Research Corp.
5.29%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.70%
KLA Corp.
3.45%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.37%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%

Diversification

CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.81%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%

Characteristics

Compare
CHPS
ZUT
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkPHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.01%2.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 22, 2021January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZUT?
As of September 4, 2026, CHPS has returned 48.11% year to date, while ZUT has returned 13.92%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZUT?
As of September 4, 2026, CHPS manages $375.31 M in assets, while ZUT manages $820.93 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZUT managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and ZUT emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Technology. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZUT?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$135.04 M in net flows, compared with -$96.30 M for ZUT. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZUT compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and ZUT?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZUT?
CHPS holds 18 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, CHPS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CHPS and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds