VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while ZWT leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.65% for ZWT. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 60.85% year-to-date with +$108 M in net flows, whereas ZWT is at 14.31% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
ZWT
| AuM | $380.79 M | $208.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | +14.11% | +53.52% | +60.85% | +118.08% | +225.77% |
ZWT | +2.29% | +20.95% | +14.31% | +36.73% | +136.20% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$44 M | +$81 M | +$108 M | +$129 M | +$157 M |
ZWT | -$33 M | -$22 M | -$8 M | +$11 M | +$31 M |
CHPS vs ZWT exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
ZWT
USA
99.58%
Sectors
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
ZWT
Information Technology
68.09%
Communication Services
20.87%
Consumer Discretionary
9.50%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
ZWT
AMAZON.COM INC
9.50%
ALPHABET INC-CL
9.32%
BROADCOM LIMITED
9.22%
NVIDIA
9.11%
MICROSOFT-T
9.02%
META PLATFORMS
8.94%
APPLE
8.25%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
4.07%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
3.30%
INTEL-T
2.84%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
ZWT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
73.57%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
ZWT
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 4.45% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | January 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZWT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZWT?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS has returned 60.85% year to date, while ZWT has returned 14.31%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZWT?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS manages $380.79 M in assets, while ZWT manages $208.94 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZWT managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZWT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CHPS and ZWT emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. ZWT is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZWT?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$108.35 M in net flows, compared with -$7.98 M for ZWT. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZWT compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZWT has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and ZWT?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. ZWT's top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, ALPHABET INC-CL, and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZWT?
CHPS holds 7 securities, while ZWT holds 29. On holdings count, ZWT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and ZWT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.