VS
When evaluating costs, CIAI features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.6% for ARTI. Performance-wise, CIAI has returned 25.8% year-to-date with -$41 M in net flows, whereas ARTI is at 14.38% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIAI
ARTI
| AuM | $1,206.74 M | $24.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.64% | 0.97% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIAI | +0.78% | -4.08% | +25.80% | +25.28% | - |
ARTI | +1.00% | +7.55% | +14.38% | +17.22% | - | |
| Flows | CIAI | -$8 M | +$44 M | -$41 M | +$64 M | - |
ARTI | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$1 M | +$3 M | - |
CIAI vs ARTI exposure
Countries
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
USA
89.89%
Other
10.11%
Sectors
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
Technology
86.22%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.03%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
Microsoft Corp.
10.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
10.03%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.33%
Broadcom Inc.
7.60%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.52%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6.48%
Oracle Corp.
3.34%
ASML Holding NV
3.11%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.37%
Diversification
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
67.75%
Characteristics
Compare
CIAI
ARTI
| Provider | CI | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 2, 2024 | March 22, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about CIAI and ARTI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIAI or ARTI?
As of September 17, 2026, CIAI has returned 25.80% year to date, while ARTI has returned 14.38%. CIAI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIAI or ARTI?
As of September 17, 2026, CIAI manages $1.21 B in assets, while ARTI manages $24.70 M. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIAI and ARTI managed?
CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ARTI is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIAI or ARTI?
Year to date, CIAI has seen -$40.78 M in net flows, compared with -$1.04 M for ARTI. ARTI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIAI and ARTI compare?
CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%, while ARTI has an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Recent articles about CIAI and ARTI
Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted on 7/20/2026 by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.