VS
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CIAI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while CHPS leans towards Information Technology. When evaluating costs, CIAI features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, CIAI has returned 27.69% year-to-date with -$84 M in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 64.84% with +$115 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIAI
CHPS
| AuM | $1,175.77 M | $397.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.64% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIAI | +8.87% | +29.10% | +27.69% | +55.90% | - |
CHPS | +19.71% | +54.06% | +64.84% | +124.29% | +230.06% | |
| Flows | CIAI | -$83 M | -$127 M | -$84 M | -$57 M | - |
CHPS | +$45 M | +$87 M | +$115 M | +$136 M | +$164 M |
CIAI vs CHPS exposure
Countries
CIAI
USA
90.42%
Other
9.58%
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
Sectors
CIAI
Information Technology
55.29%
Other
18.41%
Communication Services
13.96%
Consumer Discretionary
7.69%
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIAI
NVIDIA
11.75%
BROADCOM LIMITED
8.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
7.02%
ALPHABET INC-CL
6.59%
MICROSOFT-T
6.09%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
5.66%
META PLATFORMS
5.34%
US8740391003
4.15%
VERTIV HOLDINGS
3.68%
US5128073062
2.56%
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
Diversification
CIAI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
61.67%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
Characteristics
Compare
CIAI
CHPS
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 2, 2024 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about CIAI and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIAI or CHPS?
As of June 17, 2026, CIAI has returned 27.69% year to date, while CHPS has returned 64.84%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIAI or CHPS?
As of June 17, 2026, CIAI manages $1.18 B in assets, while CHPS manages $397.09 M. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIAI and CHPS managed?
CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CIAI and CHPS emphasize?
CIAI is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIAI or CHPS?
Year to date, CIAI has seen -$84.35 M in net flows, compared with +$115.17 M for CHPS. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIAI and CHPS compare?
CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of CIAI and CHPS?
CIAI's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIAI or CHPS?
CIAI holds 29 securities, while CHPS holds 7. On holdings count, CIAI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIAI and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.