VS
When evaluating costs, CIAI features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.35% for TEC. Performance-wise, CIAI has returned 24.27% year-to-date with -$41 M in net flows, whereas TEC is at 17.49% with +$700 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIAI
TEC
| AuM | $1,192.07 M | $5,209.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.64% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.50% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIAI | -3.71% | -2.68% | +24.27% | +25.61% | - |
TEC | +0.63% | +2.91% | +17.49% | +21.18% | +115.44% | |
| Flows | CIAI | -$8 M | +$50 M | -$41 M | +$64 M | - |
TEC | +$37 M | +$175 M | +$700 M | +$851 M | +$1,095 M |
CIAI vs TEC exposure
Countries
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
USA
89.35%
Other
10.65%
Sectors
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
Technology
81.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.60%
Other
11.14%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
NVIDIA Corp.
12.14%
Apple, Inc.
11.44%
Microsoft Corp.
8.82%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.36%
Broadcom Inc.
4.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.68%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.15%
Tesla, Inc.
2.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.40%
Diversification
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 229 total
62.11%
Characteristics
Compare
CIAI
TEC
| Provider | CI | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 2, 2024 | May 9, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CIAI and TEC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIAI or TEC?
As of September 17, 2026, CIAI has returned 24.27% year to date, while TEC has returned 17.49%. CIAI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIAI or TEC?
As of September 17, 2026, CIAI manages $1.19 B in assets, while TEC manages $5.21 B. TEC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIAI and TEC managed?
CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. TEC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIAI or TEC?
Year to date, CIAI has seen -$40.78 M in net flows, compared with +$700.35 M for TEC. TEC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIAI and TEC compare?
CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%, while TEC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about CIAI and TEC
Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted on 7/20/2026 by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.