VS
When evaluating costs, CIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.7% for CINF. Performance-wise, CIF has returned 18.97% year-to-date with +$424 M in net flows, whereas CINF is at 12.39% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIF
CINF
| AuM | $1,535.90 M | $455.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.70% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.90% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIF | -3.70% | -5.34% | +18.97% | +22.26% | +97.80% |
CINF | -2.34% | -4.01% | +12.39% | +14.53% | +52.87% | |
| Flows | CIF | -$1 M | +$98 M | +$424 M | +$526 M | +$785 M |
CINF | +$13 M | +$17 M | +$25 M | +$31 M | +$47 M |
CIF vs CINF exposure
Countries
CIF
USA
40.12%
Canada
34.69%
Brazil
7.87%
Other
17.32%
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CIF
Utilities
44.52%
Energy
26.50%
Industrials
25.50%
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.37%
Edison International
5.33%
Enel Chile SA
4.25%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.86%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.66%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.56%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.35%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.23%
Keyera Corp.
3.12%
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.85%
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CIF
CINF
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.65% | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 27, 2008 | May 12, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CIF and CINF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIF or CINF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF has returned 18.97% year to date, while CINF has returned 12.39%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIF or CINF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF manages $1.54 B in assets, while CINF manages $455.58 M. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIF and CINF managed?
CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark. CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIF or CINF?
Year to date, CIF has seen +$424.38 M in net flows, compared with +$25.05 M for CINF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIF and CINF compare?
CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Recent articles about CIF and CINF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.