VS
Compare iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) vs AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIF and QIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.45% for QIF. Performance-wise, CIF has returned 18.97% year-to-date with +$424 M in net flows, whereas QIF is at 6.17% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIF
QIF
| AuM | $1,535.90 M | $139.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIF | -3.70% | -5.34% | +18.97% | +22.26% | +97.80% |
QIF | -3.85% | -7.17% | +6.17% | +9.22% | +49.26% | |
| Flows | CIF | -$1 M | +$98 M | +$424 M | +$526 M | +$785 M |
QIF | +$3 M | +$4 M | -$7 M | -$7 M | -$140 M |
CIF vs QIF exposure
Countries
CIF
USA
40.12%
Canada
34.69%
Brazil
7.87%
Other
17.32%
QIF
USA
50.15%
Spain
12.20%
Canada
8.97%
Italy
8.55%
Other
20.13%
Sectors
CIF
Utilities
44.52%
Energy
26.50%
Industrials
25.50%
QIF
Utilities
47.80%
Energy
19.27%
Industrials
18.66%
Other
14.27%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.37%
Edison International
5.33%
Enel Chile SA
4.25%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.86%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.66%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.56%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.35%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.23%
Keyera Corp.
3.12%
QIF
Iberdrola SA
5.73%
Enbridge, Inc.
5.38%
Aena S.M.E. SA
4.54%
Enel SpA
3.55%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.46%
SNAM SpA
2.58%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.44%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2.38%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
2.08%
TC Energy Corp.
2.08%
Diversification
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.85%
QIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 82 total
34.21%
Characteristics
Compare
CIF
QIF
| Provider | iShares | AGF |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.65% | 4.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 27, 2008 | February 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about CIF and QIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIF or QIF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF has returned 18.97% year to date, while QIF has returned 6.17%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIF or QIF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF manages $1.54 B in assets, while QIF manages $139.04 M. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIF and QIF managed?
CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark. QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CIF and QIF emphasize?
CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. QIF is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIF or QIF?
Year to date, CIF has seen +$424.38 M in net flows, compared with -$7.21 M for QIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIF and QIF compare?
CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of CIF and QIF?
CIF's largest holdings include ATCO Ltd., Edison International, and Enel Chile SA. QIF's top holdings include Iberdrola SA, Enbridge, Inc., and Aena S.M.E. SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIF or QIF?
CIF holds 60 securities, while QIF holds 82. On holdings count, QIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIF and QIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.