VS
Compare iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) vs TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIF provides Utilities, Energy, and Industrials exposures, while TINF is primarily weighted in Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for TINF. Performance-wise, CIF has returned 18.97% year-to-date with +$424 M in net flows, whereas TINF is at 6.14% with +$187 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIF
TINF
| AuM | $1,535.90 M | $460.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIF | -3.70% | -5.34% | +18.97% | +22.26% | +97.80% |
TINF | -2.93% | -6.77% | +6.14% | +7.31% | +53.42% | |
| Flows | CIF | -$1 M | +$98 M | +$424 M | +$526 M | +$785 M |
TINF | +$25 M | +$69 M | +$187 M | +$239 M | +$305 M |
CIF vs TINF exposure
Countries
CIF
USA
40.12%
Canada
34.69%
Brazil
7.87%
Other
17.32%
TINF
USA
36.21%
Spain
14.01%
Canada
8.97%
Other
40.81%
Sectors
CIF
Utilities
44.52%
Energy
26.50%
Industrials
25.50%
TINF
Utilities
43.27%
Industrials
33.67%
Energy
22.64%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.37%
Edison International
5.33%
Enel Chile SA
4.25%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.86%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.66%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.56%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.35%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.23%
Keyera Corp.
3.12%
TINF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.13%
Iberdrola SA
5.63%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.30%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
4.56%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.29%
The Southern Co.
3.84%
TC Energy Corp.
3.51%
Enel SpA
3.48%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
3.09%
National Grid Plc
2.94%
Diversification
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.85%
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 49 total
42.78%
Characteristics
Compare
CIF
TINF
| Provider | iShares | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.65% | 2.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 27, 2008 | June 2, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CIF and TINF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIF or TINF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF has returned 18.97% year to date, while TINF has returned 6.14%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIF or TINF?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF manages $1.54 B in assets, while TINF manages $460.31 M. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIF and TINF managed?
CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark. TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CIF and TINF emphasize?
CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIF or TINF?
Year to date, CIF has seen +$424.38 M in net flows, compared with +$187.35 M for TINF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIF and TINF compare?
CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of CIF and TINF?
CIF's largest holdings include ATCO Ltd., Edison International, and Enel Chile SA. TINF's top holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, Iberdrola SA, and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CIF or TINF?
CIF holds 60 securities, while TINF holds 49. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIF and TINF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.