VS
When evaluating costs, CINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, CINF has returned 12.96% year-to-date with +$35 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 22.5% with +$455 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CINF
CIF
| AuM | $466.73 M | $1,606.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CINF | +0.05% | -3.79% | +12.96% | +9.15% | +61.56% |
CIF | +2.97% | -3.39% | +22.50% | +19.95% | +112.61% | |
| Flows | CINF | +$10 M | +$25 M | +$35 M | +$37 M | +$57 M |
CIF | +$33 M | +$74 M | +$455 M | +$531 M | +$823 M |
CINF vs CIF exposure
Countries
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
USA
38.98%
Canada
35.13%
Brazil
7.63%
Other
18.26%
Sectors
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
Utilities
42.00%
Energy
28.71%
Industrials
25.55%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.17%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.68%
Enel Chile SA
4.23%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.95%
Edison International
3.80%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.64%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.44%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.38%
UGI Corp.
3.32%
Keyera Corp.
3.27%
Diversification
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
38.88%
Characteristics
Compare
CINF
CIF
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.53% | 1.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 12, 2020 | August 27, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about CINF and CIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CINF or CIF?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF has returned 12.96% year to date, while CIF has returned 22.50%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CINF or CIF?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF manages $466.73 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.61 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CINF and CIF managed?
CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CINF or CIF?
Year to date, CINF has seen +$34.82 M in net flows, compared with +$455.34 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CINF and CIF compare?
CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about CINF and CIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.