VS
When evaluating costs, CINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 1.5% for NNRG. Performance-wise, CINF has returned 14.4% year-to-date with +$35 M in net flows, whereas NNRG is at 57.11% with +$61 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CINF
NNRG
| AuM | $472.71 M | $484.18 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 1.79% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CINF | +1.79% | -2.35% | +14.40% | +10.63% | +61.15% |
NNRG | +5.17% | +14.89% | +57.11% | +75.34% | +77.49% | |
| Flows | CINF | +$10 M | +$25 M | +$35 M | +$37 M | +$57 M |
NNRG | -$1 M | +$1 M | +$61 M | +$36 M | -$159 M |
CINF vs NNRG exposure
Countries
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CINF
NNRG
| Provider | CI | Ninepoint Partners |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.50% | 0.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 12, 2020 | May 14, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about CINF and NNRG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CINF or NNRG?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF has returned 14.40% year to date, while NNRG has returned 57.11%. NNRG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CINF or NNRG?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF manages $472.71 M in assets, while NNRG manages $484.18 M. NNRG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CINF and NNRG managed?
CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. NNRG is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CINF or NNRG?
Year to date, CINF has seen +$34.82 M in net flows, compared with +$61.26 M for NNRG. NNRG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CINF and NNRG compare?
CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while NNRG has an expense ratio of 1.79%.
Recent articles about CINF and NNRG
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Posted 3 days ago by Kyle Anthony inDividends
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.