VS
Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU.C) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU and CLU.C provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CLU.C. Performance-wise, CLU has returned 12.02% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas CLU.C is at 15.89% with -$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLU
CLU.C
| AuM | $114.61 M | $102.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.21% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLU | +1.94% | +4.53% | +12.02% | +21.59% | +55.62% |
CLU.C | +2.07% | +7.70% | +15.89% | +26.47% | +73.18% | |
| Flows | CLU | +$0 M | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$22 M | -$45 M |
CLU.C | +$4 M | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$8 M | -$17 M |
CLU vs CLU.C exposure
Countries
CLU
USA
96.11%
CLU.C
USA
96.11%
Sectors
CLU
Finance
21.87%
Technology
21.40%
Healthcare
11.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Industrials
7.56%
Energy
7.37%
Other
19.48%
CLU.C
Finance
21.87%
Technology
21.40%
Healthcare
11.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Industrials
7.56%
Energy
7.37%
Other
19.48%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLU
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.80%
Microsoft Corp.
2.69%
Apple, Inc.
2.50%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.93%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.54%
Intel Corp.
1.51%
Bank of America Corp.
1.18%
Chevron Corp.
1.13%
CLU.C
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.80%
Microsoft Corp.
2.69%
Apple, Inc.
2.50%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.93%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.54%
Intel Corp.
1.51%
Bank of America Corp.
1.18%
Chevron Corp.
1.13%
Diversification
CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.41%
CLU.C
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.41%
Characteristics
Compare
CLU
CLU.C
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD | FTSE RAFI US 1000 Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.23% | 1.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 8, 2006 | April 7, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CLU and CLU.C
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CLU or CLU.C?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU has returned 12.02% year to date, while CLU.C has returned 15.89%. CLU.C is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or CLU.C?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU manages $114.61 M in assets, while CLU.C manages $102.78 M. CLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and CLU.C managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CLU.C is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CLU and CLU.C emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. CLU.C is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CLU or CLU.C?
Year to date, CLU has seen -$9.68 M in net flows, compared with -$4.01 M for CLU.C. CLU.C has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CLU and CLU.C compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while CLU.C has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and CLU.C?
CLU's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. CLU.C's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or CLU.C?
CLU holds 994 securities, while CLU.C holds 994. On holdings count, CLU is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.