VS
Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU and JAVA provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.44% for JAVA. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLU
JAVA
| AuM | $111.11 M | $117.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLU | +0.63% | - | - | - | - |
JAVA | +0.45% | +6.76% | +17.07% | +24.03% | - | |
| Flows | CLU | +$110 M | - | - | - | - |
JAVA | +$0 M | +$82 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
CLU vs JAVA exposure
Countries
CLU
USA
93.61%
JAVA
USA
93.96%
Sectors
CLU
Finance
23.39%
Technology
19.11%
Healthcare
12.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.55%
Industrials
7.16%
Other
27.47%
JAVA
Finance
24.14%
Technology
18.82%
Healthcare
13.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
22.86%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLU
Microsoft Corp.
2.62%
Apple, Inc.
2.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.20%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.66%
US30233Q1085
1.62%
Bank of America Corp.
1.37%
Intel Corp.
1.17%
Chevron Corp.
1.16%
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.18%
Microsoft Corp.
5.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of America Corp.
2.62%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.41%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.61%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.55%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.51%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.46%
The Walt Disney Co.
1.43%
Diversification
CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.44%
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 153 total
28.26%
Characteristics
Compare
CLU
JAVA
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD Hedged | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 6, 2026 | March 19, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about CLU and JAVA
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or JAVA?
As of September 2, 2026, CLU manages $111.11 M in assets, while JAVA manages $117.30 M. JAVA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and JAVA managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD Hedged benchmark. JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CLU and JAVA emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of CLU and JAVA compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and JAVA?
CLU's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.. JAVA's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or JAVA?
CLU holds 985 securities, while JAVA holds 151. On holdings count, CLU is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.