VS
Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II (PXS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while PXS is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.44% for PXS. Performance-wise, CLU has returned 12.02% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas PXS is at 19.26% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLU
PXS
| AuM | $114.61 M | $54.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.21% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLU | +1.94% | +4.53% | +12.02% | +21.59% | +55.62% |
PXS | +1.78% | +10.25% | +19.26% | +31.36% | +83.35% | |
| Flows | CLU | +$0 M | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$22 M | -$45 M |
PXS | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | +$8 M | -$18 M |
CLU vs PXS exposure
Countries
CLU
USA
96.11%
PXS
USA
97.79%
Sectors
CLU
Finance
21.87%
Technology
21.40%
Healthcare
11.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Industrials
7.56%
Energy
7.37%
Other
19.48%
PXS
Technology
29.35%
Finance
17.19%
Healthcare
11.01%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.42%
Industrials
8.02%
Energy
7.55%
Other
17.46%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLU
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.80%
Microsoft Corp.
2.69%
Apple, Inc.
2.50%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.93%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.54%
Intel Corp.
1.51%
Bank of America Corp.
1.18%
Chevron Corp.
1.13%
PXS
Alphabet, Inc.
4.68%
Apple, Inc.
4.53%
Intel Corp.
3.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.31%
Microsoft Corp.
2.19%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.73%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.65%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.55%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.42%
Diversification
CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.41%
PXS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,001 total
24.70%
Characteristics
Compare
CLU
PXS
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.23% | 1.21% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 8, 2006 | April 14, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about CLU and PXS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CLU or PXS?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU has returned 12.02% year to date, while PXS has returned 19.26%. PXS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or PXS?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU manages $114.61 M in assets, while PXS manages $54.02 M. CLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and PXS managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. PXS is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CLU and PXS emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. PXS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CLU or PXS?
Year to date, CLU has seen -$9.68 M in net flows, compared with +$7.04 M for PXS. PXS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CLU and PXS compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while PXS has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and PXS?
CLU's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. PXS's top holdings include Alphabet, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Intel Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or PXS?
CLU holds 994 securities, while PXS holds 1000. On holdings count, PXS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.