CLU
iShares US Fundamental Index ETF

Full CLU fund page
VS
PXS
CI Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II

Full PXS fund page

Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs CI Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II (PXS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while PXS is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.44% for PXS. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CLU
+0.63%----
PXS
-1.10%+4.94%+22.00%+29.73%+80.64%
Flows
CLU
+$110 M----
PXS
+$1 M+$1 M+$8 M+$8 M-$16 M

CLU vs PXS exposure

Countries

CLU
USA
93.61%
PXS
USA
95.19%

Sectors

CLU
Finance
23.39%
Technology
19.11%
Healthcare
12.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.55%
Industrials
7.16%
Other
27.47%
PXS
Technology
24.48%
Finance
19.57%
Healthcare
12.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.64%
Industrials
7.70%
Other
26.11%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CLU
Microsoft Corp.
2.62%
Apple, Inc.
2.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.20%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.66%
US30233Q1085
1.62%
Bank of America Corp.
1.37%
Intel Corp.
1.17%
Chevron Corp.
1.16%
PXS
Apple, Inc.
4.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.49%
Microsoft Corp.
2.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.97%
US30233Q1085
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Intel Corp.
1.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.46%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.36%

Diversification

CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.44%
PXS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 999 total
22.33%

Characteristics

Compare
CLU
PXS
ProvideriSharesCI
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD HedgedRAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-1.18%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 6, 2026April 14, 2015

Frequently asked questions about CLU and PXS

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or PXS?
As of September 2, 2026, CLU manages $111.11 M in assets, while PXS manages $55.94 M. CLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and PXS managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD Hedged benchmark. PXS is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CLU and PXS emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. PXS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of CLU and PXS compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while PXS has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and PXS?
CLU's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.. PXS's top holdings include Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or PXS?
CLU holds 985 securities, while PXS holds 990. On holdings count, PXS is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds