VS
Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs BMO US Large Cap Disciplined Value ETF (ZBVU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while ZBVU is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.51% for ZBVU. Performance-wise, CLU has returned 12.02% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas ZBVU is at 18.64% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLU
ZBVU
| AuM | $114.61 M | $10.59 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.51% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.21% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLU | +1.94% | +4.53% | +12.02% | +21.59% | +55.62% |
ZBVU | +1.16% | +12.66% | +18.64% | +32.29% | - | |
| Flows | CLU | +$0 M | -$3 M | -$10 M | -$22 M | -$45 M |
ZBVU | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | - |
CLU vs ZBVU exposure
Countries
CLU
USA
96.11%
ZBVU
USA
94.30%
Sectors
CLU
Finance
21.87%
Technology
21.40%
Healthcare
11.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Industrials
7.56%
Energy
7.37%
Other
19.48%
ZBVU
Finance
29.96%
Technology
19.77%
Industrials
10.21%
Healthcare
9.83%
Other
30.24%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLU
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.80%
Microsoft Corp.
2.69%
Apple, Inc.
2.50%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.93%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.54%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.54%
Intel Corp.
1.51%
Bank of America Corp.
1.18%
Chevron Corp.
1.13%
ZBVU
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.10%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.25%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.54%
Bank of America Corp.
3.53%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.24%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.23%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
3.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.11%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.00%
Morgan Stanley
2.93%
Diversification
CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.41%
ZBVU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 53 total
35.13%
Characteristics
Compare
CLU
ZBVU
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.23% | 0.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 8, 2006 | May 21, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about CLU and ZBVU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CLU or ZBVU?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU has returned 12.02% year to date, while ZBVU has returned 18.64%. ZBVU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or ZBVU?
As of July 17, 2026, CLU manages $114.61 M in assets, while ZBVU manages $10.59 M. CLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and ZBVU managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 (CAD Hedged) Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZBVU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CLU and ZBVU emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. ZBVU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CLU or ZBVU?
Year to date, CLU has seen -$9.68 M in net flows, compared with +$1.83 M for ZBVU. ZBVU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CLU and ZBVU compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZBVU has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and ZBVU?
CLU's largest holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc.. ZBVU's top holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or ZBVU?
CLU holds 994 securities, while ZBVU holds 53. On holdings count, CLU is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.