VS
When evaluating costs, CMR features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.11% for CASH. Performance-wise, CMR has returned 1.66% year-to-date with +$268 M in net flows, whereas CASH is at 1.47% with -$130 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CMR
CASH
| AuM | $2,784.10 M | $6,519.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CMR | +0.20% | +0.59% | +1.66% | +2.39% | +10.97% |
CASH | +0.17% | +0.52% | +1.47% | +2.09% | +10.26% | |
| Flows | CMR | +$78 M | +$175 M | +$268 M | +$628 M | +$2,190 M |
CASH | -$37 M | -$145 M | -$130 M | -$216 M | +$3,017 M |
CMR vs CASH exposure
Countries
CMR
Other
85.94%
Canada
14.06%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CMR
Other
85.94%
Municipal
7.44%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CMR
CA68325JV595
2.26%
CA29250PVL17
1.44%
CA55379XVV32
1.20%
CA89119LV502
1.11%
CA453040V619
1.11%
Alberta, Bills 0% 6apr2027, CAD (364D)
1.09%
CMHC, FRN 15sep2026, CAD (99)
1.04%
CA29250PVJ60
1.01%
CA60689MUY79
0.93%
Province of Ontario, Bills 0% 26aug2026, USD (364D)
0.93%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CMR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 151 total
12.13%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CMR and CASH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CMR or CASH?
As of September 17, 2026, CMR has returned 1.66% year to date, while CASH has returned 1.47%. CMR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CMR or CASH?
As of September 17, 2026, CMR manages $2.78 B in assets, while CASH manages $6.52 B. CASH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CMR and CASH managed?
CMR is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CMR or CASH?
Year to date, CMR has seen +$267.52 M in net flows, compared with -$130.03 M for CASH. CMR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CMR and CASH compare?
CMR has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about CMR and CASH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.