VS
Compare CI Alternative North American Opportunities Fund (CNAO) vs CI Global Longevity Economy Fund ETF (LONG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CNAO provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while LONG is primarily weighted in Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, CNAO features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.7% for LONG. Performance-wise, CNAO has returned 5.36% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas LONG is at 4.91% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CNAO
LONG
| AuM | $47.35 M | $4.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.70% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.21% | 0.95% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNAO | -0.44% | +7.48% | +5.36% | +11.37% | +60.49% |
LONG | -1.73% | +4.85% | +4.91% | +16.27% | +53.21% | |
| Flows | CNAO | +$1 M | -$2 M | -$4 M | -$3 M | +$41 M |
LONG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
CNAO vs LONG exposure
Countries
CNAO
USA
83.96%
Canada
10.06%
LONG
USA
86.35%
Other
13.65%
Sectors
CNAO
Technology
66.80%
Healthcare
14.58%
Industrials
11.07%
Other
7.55%
LONG
Technology
63.75%
Healthcare
28.85%
Other
7.41%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CNAO
NVIDIA Corp.
7.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.08%
DexCom, Inc.
5.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.20%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
5.05%
Celestica, Inc.
4.84%
Microsoft Corp.
4.67%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.38%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.09%
Snowflake, Inc.
3.78%
LONG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.23%
DexCom, Inc.
7.94%
Broadcom Inc.
7.64%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
7.03%
Microsoft Corp.
6.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.92%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.65%
Diversification
CNAO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
51.21%
LONG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
63.18%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CNAO and LONG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CNAO or LONG?
As of July 17, 2026, CNAO has returned 5.36% year to date, while LONG has returned 4.91%. CNAO is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CNAO or LONG?
As of July 17, 2026, CNAO manages $47.35 M in assets, while LONG manages $4.27 M. CNAO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CNAO and LONG managed?
CNAO is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. LONG is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CNAO and LONG emphasize?
CNAO is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. LONG is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CNAO or LONG?
Year to date, CNAO has seen -$3.80 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for LONG. LONG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CNAO and LONG compare?
CNAO has an expense ratio of 1.21%, while LONG has an expense ratio of 0.95%.
What are the top holdings of CNAO and LONG?
CNAO's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and DexCom, Inc.. LONG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., DexCom, Inc., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CNAO or LONG?
CNAO holds 35 securities, while LONG holds 27. On holdings count, CNAO is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.