VS
When evaluating costs, CQHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CQHI has returned 40.28% year-to-date with +$13 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.34% with -$482 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CQHI
HBNK
| AuM | $25.25 M | $762.80 M |
| Management Fees | 0.29% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.29% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQHI | -4.14% | +15.35% | +40.28% | +47.07% | - |
HBNK | +3.64% | +1.69% | +32.34% | +49.32% | +165.25% | |
| Flows | CQHI | +$3 M | +$6 M | +$13 M | +$18 M | - |
HBNK | +$31 M | -$53 M | -$482 M | -$593 M | -$113 M |
CQHI vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CQHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
CQHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CQHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
CQHI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
CQHI
HBNK
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 11.65% | 2.60% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 22, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CQHI and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CQHI or HBNK?
As of September 22, 2026, CQHI has returned 40.28% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.34%. CQHI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CQHI or HBNK?
As of September 22, 2026, CQHI manages $25.25 M in assets, while HBNK manages $762.80 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CQHI and HBNK managed?
CQHI is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CQHI or HBNK?
Year to date, CQHI has seen +$12.69 M in net flows, compared with -$482.39 M for HBNK. CQHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CQHI and HBNK compare?
CQHI has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about CQHI and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.