VS
When evaluating costs, CQLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CQLI has returned 6.38% year-to-date with +$36 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 14.35% with -$447 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CQLI
HBNK
| AuM | $650.07 M | $692.03 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.43% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQLI | +1.63% | +4.10% | +6.38% | +14.44% | +50.85% |
HBNK | +15.00% | +14.77% | +14.35% | +66.58% | - | |
| Flows | CQLI | +$36 M | +$39 M | +$36 M | +$52 M | +$556 M |
HBNK | -$181 M | -$397 M | -$447 M | -$703 M | - |
CQLI vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CQLI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.99%
Sectors
CQLI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CQLI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%
Diversification
CQLI
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%
Characteristics
Compare
CQLI
HBNK
| Provider | CIBC | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.80% | 2.90% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 16, 2021 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CQLI and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CQLI or HBNK?
As of April 30, 2026, CQLI has returned 6.38% year to date, while HBNK has returned 14.35%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CQLI or HBNK?
As of April 30, 2026, CQLI manages $650.07 M in assets, while HBNK manages $692.03 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CQLI and HBNK managed?
CQLI is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CQLI or HBNK?
Year to date, CQLI has seen +$35.87 M in net flows, compared with -$447.16 M for HBNK. CQLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CQLI and HBNK compare?
CQLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about CQLI and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.