VS
Compare CIBC Qx International Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLI) vs BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CQLI provides Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications exposures, while ZDH is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, CQLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for ZDH. Performance-wise, CQLI has returned 13.12% year-to-date with +$60 M in net flows, whereas ZDH is at 13.99% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CQLI
ZDH
| AuM | $700.61 M | $236.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQLI | +4.01% | -1.24% | +13.12% | +14.72% | +65.37% |
ZDH | -0.54% | -2.36% | +13.99% | +19.63% | +59.94% | |
| Flows | CQLI | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$60 M | +$61 M | +$580 M |
ZDH | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$7 M | +$10 M | -$19 M |
CQLI vs ZDH exposure
Countries
CQLI
France
10.66%
Switzerland
10.61%
Australia
10.33%
Singapore
8.54%
Japan
7.77%
Other
52.09%
ZDH
Japan
22.89%
United Kingdom
13.38%
France
12.76%
Netherlands
8.04%
Switzerland
7.38%
Other
35.55%
Sectors
CQLI
Finance
42.10%
Utilities
13.81%
Telecommunications
13.21%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.48%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
11.86%
ZDH
Finance
30.46%
Industrials
13.10%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.42%
Healthcare
8.78%
Technology
8.50%
Other
29.75%
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CQLI
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
1.81%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB
1.74%
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
1.58%
SoftBank Corp.
1.57%
DNB Bank ASA
1.54%
Iberdrola SA
1.53%
ageas SA/NV
1.47%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.46%
Tesco Plc
1.45%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
1.45%
ZDH
ASML Holding NV
3.59%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
2.61%
Roche Holding AG
2.43%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
2.40%
TotalEnergies SE
2.32%
Shell Plc
2.28%
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.21%
Siemens AG
2.03%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.94%
Enel SpA
1.87%
Diversification
CQLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
15.60%
ZDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
23.67%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CQLI and ZDH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CQLI or ZDH?
As of November 3, 2026, CQLI has returned 13.12% year to date, while ZDH has returned 13.99%. ZDH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CQLI or ZDH?
As of November 3, 2026, CQLI manages $700.61 M in assets, while ZDH manages $236.43 M. CQLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CQLI and ZDH managed?
CQLI is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZDH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CQLI and ZDH emphasize?
CQLI is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Telecommunications. ZDH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CQLI or ZDH?
Year to date, CQLI has seen +$60.03 M in net flows, compared with +$6.66 M for ZDH. CQLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CQLI and ZDH compare?
CQLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while ZDH has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of CQLI and ZDH?
CQLI's largest holdings include Assicurazioni Generali SpA, Svenska Handelsbanken AB, and Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. ZDH's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CQLI or ZDH?
CQLI holds 100 securities, while ZDH holds 112. On holdings count, ZDH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CQLI and ZDH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.