VS
CIBC Qx U.S. Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLU) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CUD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CQLU focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while CUD leans towards Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CQLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.6% for CUD. Performance-wise, CQLU has returned 13.38% year-to-date with +$173 M in net flows, whereas CUD is at 13.83% with -$20 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CQLU
CUD
| AuM | $1,185.16 M | $248.14 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.34% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.19% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQLU | +3.92% | +8.97% | +13.38% | +11.89% | +44.32% |
CUD | +3.65% | +7.10% | +13.83% | +14.21% | +26.40% | |
| Flows | CQLU | +$12 M | +$42 M | +$173 M | +$175 M | +$1,130 M |
CUD | -$1 M | -$10 M | -$20 M | -$34 M | -$168 M |
CQLU vs CUD exposure
Countries
CQLU
USA
94.83%
CUD
USA
94.47%
Sectors
CQLU
Finance
32.22%
Utilities
19.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
15.44%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
24.74%
CUD
Finance
17.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.89%
Industrials
14.60%
Utilities
14.24%
Technology
8.69%
Non-Energy Materials
8.15%
Other
22.43%
As of July 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CQLU
Johnson & Johnson
2.45%
Altria Group, Inc.
2.45%
The Southern Co.
2.37%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.29%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.27%
Federal Realty Investment Trust
2.15%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.98%
Atmos Energy Corp.
1.95%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
1.91%
Alliant Energy Corp.
1.88%
CUD
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.15%
Realty Income Corp.
2.14%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.76%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
1.75%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.63%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
1.57%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.56%
Target Corp.
1.55%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.54%
Edison International
1.45%
Diversification
CQLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 76 total
21.68%
CUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 154 total
17.09%
Characteristics
Compare
CQLU
CUD
| Provider | CIBC | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.69% | 1.79% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 16, 2021 | September 13, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about CQLU and CUD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CQLU or CUD?
As of July 28, 2026, CQLU has returned 13.38% year to date, while CUD has returned 13.83%. CUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CQLU or CUD?
As of July 28, 2026, CQLU manages $1.19 B in assets, while CUD manages $248.14 M. CQLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CQLU and CUD managed?
CQLU is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. CUD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CQLU and CUD emphasize?
CQLU is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CUD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CQLU or CUD?
Year to date, CQLU has seen +$173.49 M in net flows, compared with -$20.28 M for CUD. CQLU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CQLU and CUD compare?
CQLU has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while CUD has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of CQLU and CUD?
CQLU's largest holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Altria Group, Inc., and The Southern Co.. CUD's top holdings include Verizon Communications, Inc., Realty Income Corp., and Kenvue, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQLU or CUD?
CQLU holds 75 securities, while CUD holds 154. On holdings count, CUD is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CQLU and CUD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.