CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page
VS
MCLC
Manulife Multifactor Canadian Large Cap Index ETF

Full MCLC fund page

Compare iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) vs Manulife Multifactor Canadian Large Cap Index ETF (MCLC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CRQ and MCLC provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.35% for MCLC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 21.54% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas MCLC is at 16.93% with +$107 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0%Aug 14Aug 21Aug 28Sep 4Sep 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 14, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CRQ
-1.29%+2.89%+21.54%+34.02%+101.36%
MCLC
-1.46%+2.28%+16.93%+26.78%+89.63%
Flows
CRQ
+$4 M+$4 M+$14 M+$14 M+$0 M
MCLC
-$15 M-$19 M+$107 M+$92 M-$6 M

CRQ vs MCLC exposure

Countries

CRQ
Canada
98.14%
MCLC
Canada
97.80%

Sectors

CRQ
Finance
48.70%
Energy
23.07%
Non-Energy Materials
8.63%
Other
19.61%
MCLC
Finance
39.16%
Energy
20.70%
Non-Energy Materials
14.92%
Other
25.22%
As of September 14, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CRQ
Royal Bank of Canada
8.88%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
8.09%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.76%
Enbridge, Inc.
5.48%
Bank of Montreal
4.93%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.90%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.85%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.46%
Brookfield Corp.
2.82%
MCLC
Royal Bank of Canada
4.46%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
4.34%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
4.18%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.85%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
3.67%
Bank of Montreal
3.48%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.22%
Brookfield Corp.
3.20%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.20%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.86%

Diversification

CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
51.03%
MCLC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
36.45%

Characteristics

Compare
CRQ
MCLC
ProvideriSharesManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CADJohn Hancock Dimensional Canadian Large Cap Equity Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.78%1.64%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 22, 2006April 17, 2017

Frequently asked questions about CRQ and MCLC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or MCLC?
As of September 14, 2026, CRQ has returned 21.54% year to date, while MCLC has returned 16.93%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or MCLC?
As of September 14, 2026, CRQ manages $154.20 M in assets, while MCLC manages $543.80 M. MCLC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CRQ and MCLC managed?
CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD benchmark. MCLC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Canadian Large Cap Equity Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CRQ and MCLC emphasize?
CRQ is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. MCLC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or MCLC?
Year to date, CRQ has seen +$14.02 M in net flows, compared with +$107.33 M for MCLC. MCLC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CRQ and MCLC compare?
CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while MCLC has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of CRQ and MCLC?
CRQ's largest holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and The Bank of Nova Scotia. MCLC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or MCLC?
CRQ holds 100 securities, while MCLC holds 80. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds