CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page
VS
PXC
Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF

Full PXC fund page

Compare iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) vs Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CRQ and PXC provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.45% for PXC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 18.03% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas PXC is at 18.84% with +$34 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CRQ
+4.27%+11.30%+18.03%+44.09%+104.66%
PXC
+3.35%+10.30%+18.84%+44.53%+106.36%
Flows
CRQ
-$0 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$10 M
PXC
-$0 M+$3 M+$34 M+$34 M-$39 M

CRQ vs PXC exposure

Countries

CRQ
Canada
99.80%
PXC
Canada
99.76%

Sectors

CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
PXC
Financials
31.84%
Energy
27.37%
Materials
10.69%
Other
9.34%
Other
20.77%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%
PXC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.95%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.81%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.97%
ENBRIDGE
4.51%
BNS
4.18%
CENOVUS ENERGY
3.58%
NUTRIEN LTD
3.40%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.20%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.98%

Diversification

CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%
PXC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
44.60%

Characteristics

Compare
CRQ
PXC
ProvideriSharesInvesco
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CADRAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.86%2.19%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 22, 2006January 26, 2012

Frequently asked questions about CRQ and PXC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or PXC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ has returned 18.03% year to date, while PXC has returned 18.84%. PXC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or PXC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ manages $146.71 M in assets, while PXC manages $255.02 M. PXC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CRQ and PXC managed?
CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. PXC is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CRQ and PXC emphasize?
CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. PXC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or PXC?
Year to date, CRQ has seen +$10.17 M in net flows, compared with +$33.96 M for PXC. PXC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CRQ and PXC compare?
CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while PXC has an expense ratio of 0.49%.
What are the top holdings of CRQ and PXC?
CRQ's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. PXC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or PXC?
CRQ holds 90 securities, while PXC holds 92. On holdings count, PXC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CRQ and PXC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds
Get ETF updates by email

Never miss the latest Canadian ETF Investing news and updates