CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page
VS
RCDC
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full RCDC fund page

iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CRQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while RCDC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.64% for RCDC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 18.03% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas RCDC is at 14.98% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CRQ
+4.27%+11.30%+18.03%+44.09%+104.66%
RCDC
+4.87%+11.75%+14.98%+31.26%+71.90%
Flows
CRQ
-$0 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$10 M
RCDC
+$6 M+$11 M+$16 M+$25 M+$28 M

CRQ vs RCDC exposure

Countries

CRQ
Canada
99.80%
RCDC
Canada
92.72%
Other
7.28%

Sectors

CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
RCDC
Financials
42.14%
Energy
16.68%
Other
13.55%
Industrials
10.31%
Other
17.32%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%
RCDC
ROYAL BK CANADA
9.53%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.73%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.66%
ENBRIDGE
4.31%
CA11271J1075
4.10%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
4.01%
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
3.93%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
3.26%
MANULIFE-S
3.26%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.24%

Diversification

CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%
RCDC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 45 total
48.03%

Characteristics

Compare
CRQ
RCDC
ProvideriSharesRBC Global Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkFTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.86%6.21%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 22, 2006January 17, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CRQ and RCDC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or RCDC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ has returned 18.03% year to date, while RCDC has returned 14.98%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or RCDC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ manages $146.71 M in assets, while RCDC manages $66.19 M. CRQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CRQ and RCDC managed?
CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. RCDC is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CRQ and RCDC emphasize?
CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. RCDC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or RCDC?
Year to date, CRQ has seen +$10.17 M in net flows, compared with +$15.63 M for RCDC. RCDC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CRQ and RCDC compare?
CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while RCDC has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of CRQ and RCDC?
CRQ's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. RCDC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or RCDC?
CRQ holds 90 securities, while RCDC holds 44. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds