CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page

iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) and BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CRQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while ZWC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 18.03% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 12.7% with +$212 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CRQ
+4.27%+11.30%+18.03%+44.09%+104.66%
ZWC
+2.22%+6.78%+12.70%+29.29%+64.10%
Flows
CRQ
-$0 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$10 M
ZWC
+$42 M+$136 M+$212 M+$284 M+$224 M

CRQ vs ZWC exposure

Countries

CRQ
Canada
99.80%
ZWC
Canada
98.39%

Sectors

CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%
ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%

Diversification

CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%

Characteristics

Compare
CRQ
ZWC
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkFTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.86%5.56%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 22, 2006February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about CRQ and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or ZWC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ has returned 18.03% year to date, while ZWC has returned 12.70%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or ZWC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ manages $146.71 M in assets, while ZWC manages $2.35 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CRQ and ZWC managed?
CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CRQ and ZWC emphasize?
CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or ZWC?
Year to date, CRQ has seen +$10.17 M in net flows, compared with +$212.10 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CRQ and ZWC compare?
CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CRQ and ZWC?
CRQ's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. ZWC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or ZWC?
CRQ holds 90 securities, while ZWC holds 34. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CRQ and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds