VS
When evaluating costs, CSAV features a management fee (MER) of 0.14%, compared to 0.15% for PSA. Performance-wise, CSAV has returned 0.67% year-to-date with -$473 M in net flows, whereas PSA is at 0.7% with -$203 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CSAV
PSA
| AuM | $4,826.86 M | $3,000.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.14% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSAV | +0.17% | +0.51% | +0.67% | +2.29% | +11.48% |
PSA | +0.17% | +0.53% | +0.70% | +2.40% | +11.90% | |
| Flows | CSAV | -$185 M | -$328 M | -$473 M | -$1,424 M | -$2,226 M |
PSA | -$55 M | -$85 M | -$203 M | -$423 M | -$701 M |
CSAV vs PSA exposure
Countries
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CSAV
PSA
| Provider | CI | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.27% | 2.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 18, 2019 | October 10, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about CSAV and PSA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CSAV or PSA?
As of April 28, 2026, CSAV has returned 0.67% year to date, while PSA has returned 0.70%. PSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CSAV or PSA?
As of April 28, 2026, CSAV manages $4.83 B in assets, while PSA manages $3.00 B. CSAV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CSAV and PSA managed?
CSAV is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. PSA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CSAV or PSA?
Year to date, CSAV has seen -$472.70 M in net flows, compared with -$202.78 M for PSA. PSA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CSAV and PSA compare?
CSAV has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while PSA has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about CSAV and PSA
High Interest Cash ETFs: All You Need to Know Heading Into 2024
Interest in these ETFs has persisted throughout 2023 amid a "higher for longer" interest rate environment.
Posted on 12/11/2023 by Jean-Charles Senant inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.