VS
When evaluating costs, CSBG features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.2% for PAGF. Performance-wise, CSBG has returned 4.76% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas PAGF is at 11.62% with +$20 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CSBG
PAGF
| AuM | $1.54 M | $214.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSBG | -2.15% | -2.35% | +4.76% | +3.63% | +41.81% |
PAGF | -1.43% | -2.09% | +11.62% | +12.11% | +62.01% | |
| Flows | CSBG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
PAGF | +$0 M | +$7 M | +$20 M | +$53 M | +$171 M |
CSBG vs PAGF exposure
Countries
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Other
43.82%
Canada
15.70%
USA
10.99%
Japan
9.73%
Other
19.75%
Sectors
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Other
43.80%
Finance
15.64%
Technology
7.10%
Other
33.46%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
US46432F8427
11.77%
CA05574G1090
11.18%
CA74642L1022
9.82%
US46090E1038
6.97%
CA46137P2026
6.61%
CA74640N1006
6.48%
US46434G8226
5.47%
CA74642G1037
5.29%
CA74643B1031
5.06%
US0250727031
5.05%
Diversification
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,198 total
73.68%
Characteristics
Compare
CSBG
PAGF
| Provider | CIBC | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.62% | 3.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | July 19, 2021 | October 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CSBG and PAGF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CSBG or PAGF?
As of November 2, 2026, CSBG has returned 4.76% year to date, while PAGF has returned 11.62%. PAGF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CSBG or PAGF?
As of November 2, 2026, CSBG manages $1.54 M in assets, while PAGF manages $214.31 M. PAGF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CSBG and PAGF managed?
CSBG is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. PAGF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CSBG or PAGF?
Year to date, CSBG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$19.98 M for PAGF. PAGF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CSBG and PAGF compare?
CSBG has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while PAGF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.