CSUU
SavvyLong (2X) Constellation Software ETF

Full CSUU fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, CSUU features a management fee (MER) of 1.25%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, CSUU has returned 28.53% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.06% with -$70 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

010203040%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CSUU
+32.49%+25.13%-28.53%-46.64%-
ZUT
+1.82%-5.88%+15.06%+8.12%+77.22%
Flows
CSUU
-$1 M-$1 M+$0 M+$3 M-
ZUT
+$28 M+$56 M-$70 M+$3 M+$256 M

CSUU vs ZUT exposure

Countries

CSUU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%

Sectors

CSUU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
As of October 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CSUU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%

Diversification

CSUU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%

Characteristics

Compare
CSUU
ZUT
ProviderLongPoint Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCSU Price - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about CSUU and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CSUU or ZUT?
As of October 20, 2026, CSUU has returned -28.53% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.06%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CSUU or ZUT?
As of October 20, 2026, CSUU manages $2.74 M in assets, while ZUT manages $854.01 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CSUU and ZUT managed?
CSUU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the CSU Price - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CSUU or ZUT?
Year to date, CSUU has seen +$0.20 M in net flows, compared with -$69.96 M for ZUT. CSUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CSUU and ZUT compare?
CSUU has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about CSUU and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds