VS
When evaluating costs, CTBF features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CTBF has returned 1.46% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 26.84% with -$417 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CTBF
HBNK
| AuM | $70.45 M | $798.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTBF | +1.65% | +1.08% | +1.46% | +4.25% | - |
HBNK | +9.01% | +23.92% | +26.84% | +69.96% | - | |
| Flows | CTBF | +$3 M | +$10 M | +$20 M | +$47 M | - |
HBNK | +$16 M | -$167 M | -$417 M | -$668 M | - |
CTBF vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CTBF
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
CTBF
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CTBF
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
CTBF
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
CTBF
HBNK
| Provider | CIBC | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.02% | 2.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 16, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CTBF and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CTBF or HBNK?
As of June 16, 2026, CTBF has returned 1.46% year to date, while HBNK has returned 26.84%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CTBF or HBNK?
As of June 16, 2026, CTBF manages $70.45 M in assets, while HBNK manages $798.57 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CTBF and HBNK managed?
CTBF is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CTBF or HBNK?
Year to date, CTBF has seen +$19.71 M in net flows, compared with -$416.98 M for HBNK. CTBF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CTBF and HBNK compare?
CTBF has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about CTBF and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.