VS
iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CUD) and CI Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF (EQL.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CUD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials, while EQL.U leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CUD features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for EQL.U. Performance-wise, CUD has returned 17.37% year-to-date with -$28 M in net flows, whereas EQL.U is at 17.3% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUD
EQL.U
| AuM | $246.79 M | $95.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.25% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.29% | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUD | +8.51% | +3.72% | +17.37% | +18.23% | +44.80% |
EQL.U | +4.36% | +1.20% | +17.30% | +18.83% | +64.56% | |
| Flows | CUD | -$2 M | -$7 M | -$28 M | -$33 M | -$147 M |
EQL.U | +$3 M | +$19 M | +$22 M | +$18 M | -$5 M |
CUD vs EQL.U exposure
Countries
CUD
USA
91.68%
Other
8.32%
EQL.U
USA
96.10%
Sectors
CUD
Finance
15.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.61%
Industrials
14.24%
Utilities
12.55%
Technology
9.37%
Healthcare
8.34%
Other
25.36%
EQL.U
Finance
20.18%
Technology
16.45%
Industrials
14.49%
Healthcare
12.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.71%
Other
28.59%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUD
Verizon Communications, Inc.
3.17%
Accenture Plc
3.14%
Chevron Corp.
2.08%
Realty Income Corp.
2.00%
PepsiCo, Inc.
1.87%
Target Corp.
1.81%
Medtronic Plc
1.77%
NIKE, Inc.
1.53%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.52%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.48%
EQL.U
US46137V3574
101.03%
Diversification
CUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 155 total
20.37%
EQL.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
101.03%
Characteristics
Compare
CUD
EQL.U
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 Equal Weight Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.78% | 1.40% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 13, 2011 | May 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about CUD and EQL.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CUD or EQL.U?
As of November 11, 2026, CUD has returned 17.37% year to date, while EQL.U has returned 17.30%. CUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUD or EQL.U?
As of November 11, 2026, CUD manages $246.79 M in assets, while EQL.U manages $95.98 M. CUD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUD and EQL.U managed?
CUD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. EQL.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: CUD or EQL.U?
CUD holds 155 securities, while EQL.U holds 1. On holdings count, CUD is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CUD or EQL.U?
Year to date, CUD has seen -$27.73 M in net flows, compared with +$21.52 M for EQL.U. EQL.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CUD and EQL.U compare?
CUD has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while EQL.U has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What sectors do CUD and EQL.U emphasize?
CUD is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. EQL.U is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Recent articles about CUD and EQL.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.