CUDV
CI U.S. Minimum Downside Volatility Index ETF

Full CUDV fund page
VS
VUDH
Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF

Full VUDH fund page

CI U.S. Minimum Downside Volatility Index ETF (CUDV) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDH) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CUDV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare, while VUDH leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CUDV features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.28% for VUDH. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CUDV
+8.16%+2.79%+6.56%+8.04%+45.57%
VUDH
+1.62%-3.35%---
Flows
CUDV
+$0 M-$1 M-$0 M-$0 M-$3 M
VUDH
+$0 M-$3 M---

CUDV vs VUDH exposure

Countries

CUDV
USA
100.57%
VUDH
USA
94.58%

Sectors

CUDV
Technology
15.86%
Industrials
14.24%
Healthcare
13.85%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
13.68%
Finance
13.23%
Business Services
9.61%
Other
19.52%
VUDH
Finance
20.74%
Technology
16.96%
Healthcare
13.60%
Industrials
10.34%
Energy
9.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.85%
Other
19.58%
As of November 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CUDV
Apple, Inc.
7.16%
Johnson & Johnson
6.14%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
5.38%
Microsoft Corp.
5.27%
RTX Corp.
5.12%
Waste Management, Inc.
4.90%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
4.70%
Lockheed Martin Corp.
4.57%
Cencora, Inc.
4.55%
The Coca-Cola Co.
4.38%
VUDH
Broadcom Inc.
6.93%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.75%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.84%
Johnson & Johnson
2.71%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.96%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.80%
Chevron Corp.
1.61%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.56%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.53%
Bank of America Corp.
1.50%

Diversification

CUDV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 122 total
52.16%
VUDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 594 total
26.20%

Characteristics

Compare
CUDV
VUDH
ProviderCIVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive US Minimum Downside Volatility Hedged to CAD Index NTR - CADFTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index - CAD Hedged
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.40%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 19, 2023April 16, 2026

Frequently asked questions about CUDV and VUDH

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUDV or VUDH?
As of November 5, 2026, CUDV manages $6.82 M in assets, while VUDH manages $3.76 M. CUDV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUDV and VUDH managed?
CUDV is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive US Minimum Downside Volatility Hedged to CAD Index NTR - CAD benchmark. VUDH is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield 15% Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do CUDV and VUDH emphasize?
CUDV is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. VUDH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of CUDV and VUDH compare?
CUDV has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while VUDH has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CUDV and VUDH?
CUDV's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Verizon Communications, Inc.. VUDH's top holdings include Broadcom Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CUDV or VUDH?
CUDV holds 122 securities, while VUDH holds 591. On holdings count, VUDH is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds